Addresses parsed
9,511
from VoteBuilder export
Effective targets
~3,900
canvass-efficiency weighted
Tier 1 targets
1,082
D-leaning, 4 precincts
Special outreach
383
senior housing, mail/tabling

The Story

How 9,511 addresses became ~3,900 effective canvass targets - and which precincts to walk first

Registration Target Analysis

Step through the narrative
1 / 6

The full picture

All 34 precincts across 8 municipalities, sorted by tier then effective target count
Precinct Municipality Raw Eff Reg. voters D% R% D-R gap Tier

Street-level drilldown

Top streets within each Tier 1 precinct - the actual walk-turf planning data

383 special outreach addresses across senior communities

After correcting address parsing (VoteBuilder encodes building numbers as "BLDG" tokens that the voter file doesn't use), most senior-community addresses now match registered voters in the building. The 383 remaining unmatched senior addresses are units with no same-base-address FVE voter at all. Of these, 254 are at Shannondell (Lower Prov 3-4, D+171) and 129 are across Worcester Township's senior facilities (Founders Village, Holly House, Laurel House, Cardinal Crest).

These addresses require institutional outreach - mail campaigns, community-room tabling, and coordination with facility management - rather than ordinary door-knock canvassing.

How we weighted the data

Ben Stevens exported 9,511 "zero registered voter" household addresses from VoteBuilder across 8 Area 4 municipalities. We built a street name normalization crosswalk (VoteBuilder and the PA voter file use different conventions - e.g., "Foxmeadow" vs "Fox Meadow", "5th" vs "Fifth", "Providence Forge" vs "Providence Frg") and cross-referenced every address to classify each into three categories: no active FVE match found (4,599 / 48.4%), ambiguous base match (4,232 / 44.5%), and active conflict (680 / 7.1%). Senior housing (383 remaining confirmed addresses) was separated for institutional outreach.

We then applied canvass-efficiency weights to each address based on its housing profile. Multi-unit addresses receive a modest discount (0.75x) reflecting lower expected contact rates from locked lobbies, higher turnover, and unit-address parsing uncertainty - not vacancy. Streets with 10+ addresses were individually profiled against the voter file for registration density and age demographics.

Data quality note: "No active FVE match" means we could not find an active voter registration at that address using our matching model. It does not mean the address is confirmed unregistered - some fraction are likely data matching failures (different address formatting between systems). During analysis, we discovered and corrected multiple systematic matching artifacts. The effective target count (~3,900) should be treated as an estimate with a confidence range, not a precise count.

CategoryWeightExample streets
Residential1.0xMill Grove Dr, Taylor Way, Brooke Dr
Mixed unit0.80xCameron Ct, Walnut St, W Ridge Pike
Occupied apartment0.70xBayless Pl, Cardin Pl, Roboda Blvd
High vacancy apt0.35xFoxmeadow Dr (176 unreg, 38 reg)
Vacant apt0.25xFoxmeadow Cir (119 unreg, 0 reg)
Senior housingSpecialShannondell Dr, Holly House

Data: VoteBuilder export (April 26, 2026) cross-referenced against PA Full Voter Export (June 8, 2026 vintage).

Source: VoteBuilder export (April 26, 2026) cross-referenced against PA Full Voter Export (June 8, 2026 vintage). Analysis by Area 4 Data Committee. Housing-type weights applied per building profile.